Crane v. Carlson
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LENROOT, Judge.
This is an interference proceeding instituted before the United States Patent Office wherein the Board of Appeals affirmed a decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention of the subject matter of all the counts, six in number, to appellee.
Counts 1 and 3 are illustrative and read as follows:
“Count 1. In combination with a navigable vehicle, an energy collecting means having a normal angular relation to a source of radiant energy and to the longitudinal axis of the vehicle, means for automatically keeping the ‘vehicle in a set heading, radio receiving…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mergenthaler v. ScudderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1897
- In re WagenhorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Brown v. BartonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Collins v. OlsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Janette v. FoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marshall B. Alpert v. Harvey L. SlatinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- In re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Ivar Jepson v. William D. Egly and Columbus W. Harris, (Two Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Senkus v. JohnstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.