Legal Opinion

Crane v. Carlson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 24, 1942No. Patent Appeal 4569PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LENROOT, Judge.

This is an interference proceeding instituted before the United States Patent Office wherein the Board of Appeals affirmed a decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention of the subject matter of all the counts, six in number, to appellee.

Counts 1 and 3 are illustrative and read as follows:

“Count 1. In combination with a navigable vehicle, an energy collecting means having a normal angular relation to a source of radiant energy and to the longitudinal axis of the vehicle, means for automatically keeping the ‘vehicle in a set heading, radio receiving…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mergenthaler v. ScudderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1897
  2. In re WagenhorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  3. Brown v. BartonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  4. Collins v. OlsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  5. Janette v. FoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marshall B. Alpert v. Harvey L. SlatinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  3. In re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  4. Ivar Jepson v. William D. Egly and Columbus W. Harris, (Two Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. Senkus v. JohnstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API