Legal Opinion

In re Cremer

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 7, 1949No. 5524PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Chief Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the Primary Examiner rejecting six claims numbered respectively 1, 10, 13, 18, 19, and 25, embraced in appellants’ application for patent, serial No. 469,436, for both a method and an apparatus for testing rubber articles and other articles made of insulating material, such as rubber sheath prophylactics, to ascertain whether such articles have minute holes too small to be seen.

Ten claims stand allowed, all being apparatus claims. Of the appealed claims only claim 10 is directed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Application of DaltonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. Application of Le BaronCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  3. Youngs Rubber Corp. v. Allied Latex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  4. Application of BoogeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Application of DaltonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API