Legal Opinion

In re Emmey

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 20, 1947No. 5298PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

Appellants appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting all of the claims 3, 4 and 6 to 20, inclusive, of an application for a patent for “Improvements in Method of Identifying Goods and Identifying Label Used Therewith.”

Claims 8 to 11, inclusive, are method claims. All of the other claims relate to articles of manufacture.

Claims 3, 8 and 20 are illustrative of the subject matter of the application and read as follows:

3. An article of manufacture comprising a film of synthetic resin for forming…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Application of JonesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. Application of MooreCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. In re FrederickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  4. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API