Legal Opinion

In re Schmidt

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 27, 1938No. 4041PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenRoot, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting, for want of patentability over the cited prior art, claims 109, 110, 116, 117, and 118 of appellant’s application for a patent. Said decision of the board also affirmed the decision of the examiner rejecting twelve other claims of appellant’s application, but appellant has not appealed from the rejection of said claims. It appears that twenty-eight claims have been allowed.

Claim 109 illustrates the general subject matter involved and reads as follows:

109.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  4. In re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  5. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API