Legal Opinion

Paducah Hosiery Mills v. Proctor & Schwartz

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 27, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op The Court by

Commissioner Hobson—

Reversing.

The Paducah Hosiery Mills is a corporation located at Paducah, Kentucky, which manufactures cotton hose. Proctor & Schwartz is a Pennsylvania corporation located at Philadelphia, which manufactures machinery. In December, 1921, it sold and delivered to the Paducah Hosiery Mills four Proctor automatic boarding, drying and stripping machines for the sum of $12,000.00, of which $500.00 was paid, the remainder to be paid in monthly installments of $500.00 each. The machines were delivered and the purchaser paid ten of the monthly installments…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glover Machine Works v. Cooke-Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Church v. Wright Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Meek Coal Co. v. George D. Whitcomb Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Cumberland Grocery Co. v. Harwood-Barley Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. McGeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  2. John S. Noel Company v. TheobaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. A. C. Morris Co., Incorporated v. HeatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Vincennes Bridge Company v. PoulosCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. v. Kaufman-Straus Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API