Legal Opinion

Cumberland Grocery Co. v. Harwood-Barley Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 25, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Adair Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Quin

Affirming.

Appellant (defendant below) was engaged in the wholesale grocery business at different points in the state. Wagons, drawn by horses, had been used in the delivery of its goods, to customers, and these it decided to replace with motor vehicles.

Four motor trucks were purchased from appellee, under a twelve months’ guarantee. The nature, effect and extent of this guarantee is the question presented for our decision. Suit was filed upon an account of $1,509.49’ for supplies furnished. Appellant denied liability on the account and by way of counterclaim…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. WoolleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
  3. Fraley v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. TuttleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Inter-Southern Life Insurance v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John S. Noel Company v. TheobaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Paducah Hosiery Mills v. Proctor & SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. M. F. Marx Manufacturing Co. v. Beha Laundry Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API