Legal Opinion

Meek Coal Co. v. George D. Whitcomb Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 25, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Johnson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

On April 27, 1907, the appellee, Whitcomb Company, submitted to the appellant coal company a proposition to furnish it a Norwalk Compound Air Compressor for the sum of $2,900, and certain other appliances to be used in connection with the compressor for $857.50, making the total cost of the machinery $3,757.50. The proposition also contained a stipulation that the Whitcomb Company, if the offer was accepted, would send an experienced man to take charge of setting the compressor and making connections thereto free of charge for a term not to exceed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. MattinglyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Dick v. James Clark, Jr., Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paducah Hosiery Mills v. Proctor & SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. A. C. Morris Co., Incorporated v. HeatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Oman-Bowling Green Stone Co. v. Sullivan Machinery Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Frick Co. v. SalyersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API