Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. McGee

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 4, 1929PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

1. The operation in question consisted in the removal of a considerable quantity of scar tissue from the palm of the plaintiff’s right hand and the grafting of skin taken from the plaintiff’s chest in place thereof. The scar tissue was the result of a severe burn caused by contact with an electric wire, which the plaintiff received about nine years before the time of the transactions here involved. There was evidence to the effect that before the operation was performed the plaintiff and his father went to the defendant’s office and that the defendant in answer to the question, “How long will…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hooper v. . StoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Isaacs v. Jackson Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Adams Hardware Co. v. WimbishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Paducah Hosiery Mills v. Proctor & SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  5. Foutty v. Chalmax Sales Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. FDP Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Smith v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  5. Dingle v. BelinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API