Legal Opinion

J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 10, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Garrard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*434Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clay

Reversing.

In the month of March, 1917, the J. I. Case Threshing Machine Company sold to R. L. Rose and W. C. Rose a plow and engine for the sum of $1,168.00, of which the purchasers paid one-half in cash and executed their note for the balance, payable December 1,1917.

The contract contained the following provisions:

£ £ Said machinery is purchased upon and subject to the following mutual and interdependent conditions, and none other, namely: It is warranted to be made of good material and durable with good care, and to be capable of doing more and better work…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Nichols & Shepherd Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. Glover Machine Works v. Cooke-Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Main v. Griffin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Crouch & Son v. LeakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  5. White v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Black Motor Co. v. FoureCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  2. Paducah Hosiery Mills v. Proctor & SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Troendly v. J. I. Case Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Marion Machine, Foundry & Supply Co. v. Cincinnati Coffin Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1955
  5. McGraw Tire & Rubber Co. v. BartonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API