Legal Opinion
LMK Enterprises, Inc. v. Sun Oil Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 7, 2004No. AC 24619PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The plaintiff, LMK Enterprises, Inc. (LMK), appeals from the trial court’s judgment of dismissal rendered pursuant to Practice Book § 15-8. LMK claims that the court improperly determined that the lease provision at issue was unambiguous in that it clearly provided that LMK had no right to any part of the condemnation award made upon the taking of defendant Sun Oil Company’s (Sunoco) 2 property by the Connecticut commissioner of transportation (commissioner). It is the plaintiffs contention that the lease provision unambiguously gives it a right to a portion of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rivera v. Double A Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Hatcho Corp. v. Della PietraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- B & D Associates Inc. v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Detels v. DetelsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Empire Paving, Inc. v. City of MilfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
3Cited by9 opinions
- Landry v. SpitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Rowe v. GouletConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. v. Property Operating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Barber v. Skip Barber Racing School, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Wolosoff v. WolosoffConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.