Legal Opinion
Wolosoff v. Wolosoff
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 13, 2005No. AC 25407; AC 25478PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Dorothy Wolosoff, appeals from the judgments of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, James Wolosoff, on the defendant’s post-judgment motions for contempt and for attorney’s fees in this dissolution action. On appeal, the defendant argues that the court improperly (1) failed to provide her with an evidentiary hearing, (2) refused to mark a proffered document for identification, (3) denied her motion for contempt and (4) denied her request for attorney’s fees under the parties’ separation agreement. We agree with the defendant as to her first and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. OnofrioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Conetta v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Duncan v. McTiernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Breiter v. BreiterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reichenbach v. Kraska Enterprises, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. RosadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Electric Cable Compounds, Inc. v. Town of SeymourConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Schwartz v. Family Dental Group, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- DiRienzo Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Salce Contracting Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.