Legal Opinion
Empire Paving, Inc. v. City of Milford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 11, 2000No. AC 18233PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The plaintiff, Empire Paving, Inc. (Empire), appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, the city of Milford (city), on Empire’s claim that the city breached the parties’ sewer construction contract. Empire claims that the trial court improperly rejected its claims for additional compensation for (1) extra paving work that was approved by the city and (2) higher than anticipated pavement cutting costs that resulted from Empire’s reliance on the *263city’s inaccurate boring logs. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.1
The trial court found…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Dills v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- HLO Land Ownership Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Days Inn of America, Inc. v. 161 Hotel Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Maskel Construction Co. v. Town of GlastonburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aubin v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. LopezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Yellow Page Consultants, Inc. v. Omni Home Health Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- LMK Enterprises, Inc. v. Sun Oil Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Riggio v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.