Hercules Oil Co. v. Thompson
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Per curiam
These suits, like Melton’s, involve the tender or permit rules and regulations of the Commission. As Melton does, these plaintiffs claim that they acquired the products of crude oil involved in the suits before December 5, when the regulations complained of were first adopted. As Melton does, they claim that the regulations and the statutes operate to deprive them of their property without due process of law. The same general claim is made in these suits by defendants as was made in Melton’s, that plaintiffs are not really the owners of these products; that their purchase of them was a device…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. Blue Diamond Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Railroad Commission v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Railroad Commission v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Amazon Petroleum Corporation v. Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1934
- Atlas Pipe Line Co. v. SterlingDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Whittington v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1936
- Lacy v. Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1935
- Tysco Oil Co. v. Railroad Commission of TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1935
- Thompson v. SpearCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- President of United States v. Artex Refineries Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.