Legal Opinion

Lacy v. Railroad Commission

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided April 29, 1935No. 510PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in this suit seeks an interlocutory and permanent injunction against state officers, restraining them from preventing the shipment of plaintiff’s oil. This case is different from the three others this day decided, Melton v. Railroad Commission (D. C.) 10 F. Supp. 984; Hercules Oil Co. v. Ernest O. Thompson and George C. Peterson Co. v. Ernest O. Thompson et al. (D. C.) 10 F. Supp. 988. The claim is that the order refusing him a permit and the regulations sought to be enforced against him are invalid because though his oil was not illegally produced,. the regulations under which he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Melton v. Railroad Commission of TexasDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1935
  2. Hercules Oil Co. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davenport v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Tysco Oil Co. v. Railroad Commission of TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1935
  3. Beaver Reclamation Oil Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. President of United States v. Artex Refineries Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1935
  5. Panama Refining Co. v. Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API