Legal Opinion
Amazon Petroleum Corporation v. Railroad Commission
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided February 12, 1934No. 632, 635PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, District Judge.
In. these related eases complainants attack the validity of an act of Congress known as the National Industrial Recovery Act (48 Stat. 195), and certain regulations of the Secretary of the Interior, the provisions of the Code for the petroleum industry established under the act, upon constitutional grounds.
In the Anding & Panama Refining Company cases, a rule to show cause was issued returnable October 2, calling upon the respondents Ryan et al. to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be granted as prayed. On the hearing upon this rule, and the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ryan v. Amazon Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Missouri Utilities Co. v. City of CaliforniaDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1934
- Duke Power Co. v. GREENWOOD, COUNTY, SCDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1935
- United States v. MillsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.