Legal Opinion

Charles L. Hardtke, Inc. v. Katz

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided July 25, 1991No. 01-90-00600-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

The question presented is whether the trial court’s specific, timely, initialed docket entry can set aside its prior order dismissing this case for want of prosecution. Under this record, we hold that it can. Consequently, we reverse and remand.

Charles L. Hardtke, Inc. (Hardtke) sued Abe Katz for breach of a loan guaranty. The trial court dismissed the suit for lack of jurisdiction in 1990, concluding that it had long before been finally dismissed for want of prosecution. The first dismissal for want of prosecution was on August 28, 1986. An order of reinstatement…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Knox v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Reese v. PiperiTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. N-S-W Corp. v. SnellTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Walker v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Emerald Oaks Hotel/Conference Center, Inc. v. ZardenettaTexas Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Quanaim v. Frasco Restaurant & Catering, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. Texas Department of Public Safety v. Deck, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  3. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. WasiakCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Intercity Management Corp. v. Chambers, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  5. Estate of Townes v. Wood, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API