Legal Opinion
Intercity Management Corp. v. Chambers
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided November 8, 1991No. 01-91-00901-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
On October 16, 1991, we issued our opinion conditionally granting writ of mandamus in this case. The Arsht Company, real party in interest, moved for rehearing, contending that our opinion was in conflict with Hardtke v. Katz, 813 S.W.2d 548 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, writ requested). We do not agree. We overrule Arsht’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following.
Relator, Intercity Management Corp. (IMC), seeks mandamus compelling the trial judge to vacate his untimely order reinstating The Arsht Company’s…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Sabine Offshore Service, Inc. v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Emerald Oaks Hotel/Conference Center, Inc. v. ZardenettaTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Clark & Co. v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Charles L. Hardtke, Inc. v. Katz, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- White v. RupardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
4Cited by19 opinions
- In Re BahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Davis v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Adams v. InmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
- Wallingford v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.