Legal Opinion

Walker v. Harrison

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1980No. B-9036PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEARS, Justice.

Relator Walker petitions this court in an original proceeding for a writ of mandamus to compel District Judge Harrison to vacate his order reinstating a case previously dismissed for want of prosecution. We conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.

The question presented is whether Judge Harrison reinstated the case in accordance with rule 165a 1 before the trial court lost jurisdiction to do so. The pertinent part of rule 165a provides:

Within thirty days after the signing of the order of dismissal, the court shall reinstate the case upon finding, after hearing, that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Comet Aluminum Company v. DibrellTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Knox v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Dunn v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Reese v. PiperiTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. N-S-W Corp. v. SnellTexas Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. State v. RosenbaumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Emerald Oaks Hotel/Conference Center, Inc. v. ZardenettaTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Estate of Howley by Through Howley v. HabermanTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Whitworth v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Davis v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API