Legal Opinion

Emerald Oaks Hotel/Conference Center, Inc. v. Zardenetta

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1989No. C-8971PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this original mandamus proceeding is whether an oral pronouncement and docket entry may be used in lieu of a written order to reinstate a cause previously dismissed for want of prosecution. A majority of the court answers no and holds that an order of reinstatement must be in writing and signed during the period of the trial court’s plenary power and jurisdiction. The trial court’s order of reinstatement conflicts with Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 165a(3) and Walker v. Harrison, 597 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.1980, orig. proceeding).

Relators Emerald Oaks Hotel/Conference Center, Inc.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walker v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Clark & Co. v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. State v. Shaw, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
  2. Ex Parte WileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Estate of Howley by Through Howley v. HabermanTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. KiblerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Davis v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API