Atwood v. Owens
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The defendants, Stephen and Kristie Owens, appeal the decision of the Superior Court (Perkins, J.) that the plaintiff, Jacob Atwood, did not violate RSA 540-A:6 (1997) by requiring a $5,000 security deposit pursuant to a rental agreement (agreement) with the defendants. We affirm.
Because the defendants failed to provide this court with a record and transcript of the hearing, we assume that the evidence was sufficient to support the result reached by the trial court. *397Accordingly, we review the superior court’s order for errors of law only. See State v. Woods, 139 N.H. 399, 403, 654 A.2d 960,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. KaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Cheever v. Southern New Hampshire Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Appeal of Ashland Electric DepartmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Lachapelle v. Town of GoffstownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bean v. Red Oak Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Averill v. CoxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Zorn v. DemetriSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Grenier v. Barclay Square Commercial Condominium Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Appeal of MorganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.