Legal Opinion
Appeal of Ashland Electric Department
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 25, 1996No. 95-260PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The petitioner, Ashland Electric Department, (Ashland) appeals an order by the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (PUC) denying Ashland’s request for a declaratory ruling that it may expand its distribution facilities within the Town of Ashland (town) without the PUC’s authorization and requiring Ashland to follow the administrative procedures set forth in RSA chapter 38 before undertaking that expansion. We affirm.
The following findings of fact by the PUC are uncontroverted. See RSA 541:13 (1974); Appeal of Public Serv. Co. of N.H., 141 N.H. 13, 16, 676 A.2d 101, 103 (1996) (findings…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- In re Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. FarrowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Atwood v. OwensSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Appeal of Pennichuck Water Works, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Appeal of RowanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Devere v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- New Hampshire Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Pitco Frialator, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.