Legal Opinion

Lachapelle v. Town of Goffstown

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 24, 1991No. 90-218PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

Batchelder, J.

The defendant, the Town of Goffstown (the Town), appeals the decision of the Superior Court {Barry, J.) denying its motion for late entry of appearance and its motion to strike default. The Town argues that service of process in the underlying suit was defective, because it did not fulfill the statutory requirements of RSA 510:10 (Supp. 1990), that the superior court did not obtain jurisdiction over the Town because service was defective, and that “justice and equity” require reversal of the trial court’s decision. We reverse and remand.

*479The plaintiff,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. Sununu v. Clamshell AllianceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. Lake Sunapee Protective Ass'n v. New Hampshire Wetlands BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  4. Clark v. BradstreetSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
  5. Hudson v. MusorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atwood v. OwensSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. Appeal of HCA Parkland Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  3. South Down Recreation Ass'n v. MoranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. Barton v. HayesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. Fischer v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API