Legal Opinion

Broome v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1935PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. For the purposes of the demurrer the facts set out in the complaint are deemed to be true. This requires a careful examination of the complaint to determine its legal effect.

The recognized doctrine in this jurisdiction is that a municipal corporation may not be held civilly liable to individuals for the negligence of its agents in performing duties which are governmental in their nature, and solely for the public benefit. Harrington v. Greenville, 159 N. C., 632; James…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. James Ex Rel. James v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Sandlin v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Harrington v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Hamilton v. City of Rocky MountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Snider v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Millar v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Glenn Ex Rel. Glenn v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API