Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Millar v. Town of Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1942PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1ConcurrenceDevin, J.

SCHENCK, J., joins in concurring opinion. Civil action in tort to recover damages for personal injuries.

The complaint, in part, alleges "That on or about the 2nd day of June, 1941, the defendant, through its proper officers and employees of one of its public utilities, to wit: The light and water plant, had dug a hole in one of the streets of said town for the purpose of installing water equipment, or repairing the same, or for some other purpose in connection with the operation of said public utilities, which hole it was necessary to guard by lights so as to give the public notice of its…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McIlhenney v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  2. Hagerman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hill v. . Board of Aldermen of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. James Ex Rel. James v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Sandlin v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Britt v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Evans v. Housing Auth. of City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Hare v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API