Legal Opinion
Glenn Ex Rel. Glenn v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 28, 1957No. 453PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The defendant assigns as error the failure of the court to allow its motion for judgment of nonsuit renewed at the close of all the evidence.
*473The defendant contends that plaintiff should have been nonsuited for the reason that he had not made out a case of actionable negligence against it, but if he has, it, as a municipal corporation, is immune to suit for negligence in the performance of a governmental duty in the operation and maintenanee of Pullen Park.
Defendant’s contention that plaintiff has not made out a case against it of actionable negligence need not detain us. Considering…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Oliver v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Lewis v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Sides v. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Estate of Williams ex rel. Overton v. Pasquotank County Parks & Recreation DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- Potts v. HowserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Dobrowolska Ex Rel. Dobrowolska v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.