Legal Opinion
Ingram v. Mandler
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1932No. 534PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Mandler, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought this suit against Ingram, hereinafter called defendant, to establish and foreclose a pledge.
On December 1, 1926, plaintiff was the holder of a promissory note for $15,000 made by Robert Marshall and Miley Marshall, his wife, and secured by a first mortgage on 492 acres of land in Wagoner county, Oklahoma. Defendant was the owner of a second mortgage on such land given to secure an indebtedness of $5,000. On such date plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant which recited that plaintiff had that day sold such note…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Markham v. . JaudonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Skiff v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Swanson v. SpencerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Dunn v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richard Hefley and Kent Martin D/B/A Agri Investment Services v. Harry JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- In Re James and Dianne Ripley, Debtors. United States of America v. James and Dianne RipleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- John W., Jr. And Gloria Furrow v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Certified Collectors, Inc. v. LesnickArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Midwood Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.