State v. Brooks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
1. Tbe admissibility of evidence, wben challenged, is, imprimis, a question for tbe trial court. Where its admission preliminarily depends upon a determination of fact, tbe court of review is ordinarily bound by tbe finding of tbe trial judge wben it is supported by evidence, and will not disturb that finding or ruling admitting tbe evidence unless there appears some error of law or legal inference.
Pertinent to confessions, it is observed in S. v. Grass, 223 N. C., 31, 33, 25 S. E. (2d), 193:
“Tbe competency of an alleged confession is a preliminary question for tbe trial court, S. v. Andrew,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. . WhitenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- State v. . HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. Andrew.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1867
- State v. . ManningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. . GrassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. RigsbeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.