Legal Opinion

State v. Rigsbee

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1974No. 7412SC185PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant assigns error to the denial of his motion for continuance based upon the unavailability of the witness Mary Helen Allen. This Court has held continually that such a motion may be granted or denied in the sound discretion of the trial court. State v. Willis, 20 N.C. App. 365, 201 S.E. 2d 588 (1974); State v. Howes, 19 N.C. App. 155, 198 S.E. 2d 86 (1973); State v. Fountain, 14 N.C. App. 82, 187 S.E. 2d 493 (1972). Counsel for defendant concedes that he was aware of the contents of the conversations between defendant and Mary Helen Allen at the time of his conference…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ShuffordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Matter of BeddingfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API