State v. Barnes
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
The charges upon which defendant was convicted arose from the same incident as the cases of State v. Sylvester Joyner, 295 N.C. 55, 243 S.E. 2d 367 (1978); State v. Curmon, 295 N.C. 453, 245 S.E. 2d 503 (1978); and State v. Roderick Thomas Joyner, 295 N.C. 349, 255 S.E. 2d 390 (1979). Although we have given careful attention to each of defendant’s assignments of error, we do not discuss here those which raise questions already answered in the other cases. In assignments of error unique to this case, defendant argues the trial court committed prejudicial error by: (1) emphasizing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Delaware Republican State Committee v. RedfearnSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981