Legal Opinion

State v. . Manning

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1942PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The defendant’s first exception is to tbe ruling of bis Honor that tbe confessions of tbe defendant were voluntary. The court, in tbe absence of the jury, beard tbe testimony of tbe witnesses and tbe defendant on tbe question as to whether or not tbe various confessions of tbe defendant were voluntary. Tbe court then found as a fact and held that tbe confessions of tbe defendant were free and voluntary.

In the case of S. v. Fain, 216 N. C., 157, 4 S. E. (2d), 319, Stacy, C. J., said: “It is tbe established procedure with us that tbe competency of a confession is a preliminary question for tbe…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. . WhitenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. State v. Andrew.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1867
  4. State v. . DickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864
  5. State v. . WagstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API