Legal Opinion

State v. Orr

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1963No. 2PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNs, J.

The defendant contends that the trial court committed error (1) by overruling his motion to dismiss; and (2) by giving the jury conflicting instructions as to the quantum of proof necessary to convict. All other exceptions and assignments of error are abandoned.

The prosecuting witness, a woman 57 years of age, testified for the State, detailing circumstances sufficient to go to the jury and to sustain its verdict. The victim was well acquainted with the defendant. She made complaint to the members of her family and to the sheriff at the first opportunity. The story she told them immediately…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. TessnearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Wyatt v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. HyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API