Posz v. Burchell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
All of the defendants appeal from a judgment against them based on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, Paul Posz, in the sum of $32,324.61 growing out of the sale to plaintiff of boysenberry plants, three-quarters of which died. The complaint as amended is based on theories as to all defendants of express warranty, implied warranty and negligence. The verdict and the judgment specify as defendants Irvin M. Burchell, doing business under the name and style of The Burchell Nursery, Irvin M. Burchell, individually and doing business as The Burchell Nursery (both hereinafter referred to as…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- In re Estate of SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Khanna v. Microdata Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Saunders v. New Capital for Small Businesses, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.