In re Estate of Sanderson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, an order of the Superior Court of the county and city of San Francisco settling the accounts of an executor. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
1. It is contended by appellant, L. A. Sanderson, executor, that a new trial of the contest of his account should be directed, because the court below failed to find up orí the issues made by the contest. But the transcript contains no bill of exceptions which shows that findings were not waived, if findings were proper. There is a bill of exceptions which recites that, when the “statement on motion for a new trial” was settled, the judge struck out from the proposed statement an allegation, “On October 3, 1883, counsel for contestants re*202quested counsel for the executor to waive findings of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boughton v. . FlintNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Estate of Moore v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Peck v. . SherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- In re Estate of MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Byrd v. WellsMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Estate of BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Purdy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.