Legal Opinion
Khanna v. Microdata Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 20, 1985No. A017717PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Microdata Corporation appeals from a judgment entered after a jury returned a general verdict awarding respondent Nand Khanna $22,858 in compensatory damages. The action was tried on causes of action for fraud (intentional misrepresentation), breach of contract, wrongful discharge, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The action arose out of the employment relationship between Microdata and respondent as its salesman. We affirm.
Facts
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to respondent (Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co. (1935) 3 Cal.2d…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Samuel "Wesley" McCabe and John Elson v. General Foods Corporation, Alan Moltz, Abner Ladson and Does 1-100Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.