Lawrence v. Ballou
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiff appealed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sanderson, J.:
The plaintiff sued as a tenant in common with the defendants. In the original or first complaint she described her interest as “fifteen acres of the Hatch Claim, situate on the Potrero Nuevo, which said fifteen acres is undivided and is to he located within” the boundaries of the Hatch Claim, etc.
The defendants, or some of them, demurred upon several grounds, one of which was founded upon the character of the plaintiff’s interest, as above alleged; it being claimed “ that her interest, if any, is imperfect, and she cannot recover until her fifteen acres shall have…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carpentier v. WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Schenk v. EvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Downer v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Corbin v. Jackson ex dem. GarnseyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
- Jackson, ex rel. Garnsey v. LivingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1831
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- De La Beckwith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Waterhouse v. GallupCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Dohoney v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.