Morrison v. Wilson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The defendant recovered judgment in the Court below, and the plaintiff appealed. The other facts áre stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Charter, J.:
This action was brought to recover of the respondents fifty vara lot Ho. 735, in the City of San Francisco. Hitchcock and Van Winkle being proprietors of the lot under an Alcalde *346grant, conveyed it to one Ford on the 20th of March, 1852. On the 21st of September, 1853, Ford mortgaged the lot to one Perkins, who thereafter bought the same under a decree of foreclosure, and on the 18th of March, 1857, he, the said Perkins, received a Sheriff’s deed therefor, which deed was recorded the same day. Perkins sold and conveyed the lot to the appellant, Morrison, May 21st,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gee v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Mitchell v. HewittMississippi Supreme Court · 1845
3Cited by18 opinions
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Burnett v. PiercyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Faivre v. DaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Gress v. EvansSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1877
- Bean v. KenmuirSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.