Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hoar

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1938No. Civ. 1900PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The following opinion was prepared by the late Mr. Justice Jennings and is adopted and published as the opinion of this court.

The appeal herein has been taken by the defendants Joe Smith as executor of the will of Gus Colberg, deceased, Mary A. O’Donnell, and Joe Smith individually from the portion of the judgment entered in this action which decreed that, these defendants have no valid right or interest in a group of five mining claims located in the Mojave Mining District of Kern County. The controversy which gave rise to the appeal was between the above-mentioned defendants and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Carlson v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Allen v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Mowry v. HeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Metropolis Tr. & Sav. Bank v. MonnierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Chamberlain v. AbelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Petersen v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Estate of De BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API