Jacobs v. All Persons, Etc.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Plaintiff brought this action under the Mc-Enerney act, so called, to quiet her title to a certain piece of real estate situate at the corner of Broderick and Sutter streets, in the city and county of San Francisco. Plaintiff alleged and claimed that she was the owner of the premises in suit in fee. The appellants appeared in the action, and while admitting plaintiff to be the owner of the premises for and during her natural life, denied that she was the owner thereof in fee, and set up a claim of title in remainder in each of them to an undivided interest in said premises. In their several…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Carpenter v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Barnett v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bodine's Adm'rs v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
- Burnett v. PiercyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McKay v. LauristonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Moakley v. Los Angeles Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hochsprung v. StevensonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Robbins v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1925
- Hilborn v. SoaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.