Clark v. Johnston
California Court of Appeal
APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco vacating satisfactions of judgments. Geo. A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLY, J., pro tem.
These are appeals by the defendants in the several cases from identical orders vacating in each case a satisfaction of judgment theretofore entered in favor of the respective plaintiffs in the actions entitled as above. The orders were made upon the motion of the respondent Rauer, a stranger to the record. There are three eases, similar in all respects, consolidated by stipulation and tried together in the superior court, and they are here upon a consolidated record under section 941a et seq. of the- Code of Civil Procedure.
Avoiding so far as possible unnecessary detail,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Towle v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- McGregor v. . ComstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Gradwohl v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Haggin v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Owens v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Argue v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Wherry v. RamboCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950