Gradwohl v. Harris
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. This action was brought to recover moneys alleged to have been advanced by Waugenheim & Blum on the following contract: “We, the undersigned, agree to refund and pay within thirty days, to Messrs.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. This action was brought to recover moneys alleged to have been advanced by Waugenheim & Blum on the following contract: “We, the undersigned, agree to refund and pay within thirty days, to Messrs. Waugenheim & Blum, such sum or sums as they may pay to the order or certificate of William A. Johnson, (a foreman of the Silver Mountain Toll Road Company,) given by him to any employés who have labored for said company under him ; also, to the order or certificate as above of George Phillips, a foreman ofx said company, to…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Shafter, J.
The plaintiff sues as assignee of Waugenheim & Blum. The assignment is denied by the defendants in their answer. Waugenheim & Blum intervened, alleging that they were and ever had been the owners of three fourths of the claim in suit, and praying judgment for the amount. The case was tried by the Court and judgment was entered for the plaintiff and intervenors to recover of the defendants the whole claim as an entirety; and it was further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff was entitled to one fourth of the amount and the intervenors to the other three fourths.
Firs…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Board of Commissioners v. JamesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Greene v. McAuleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Mahon v. RankinOregon Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.