Legal Opinion
Owens v. Lynch
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 17, 1931No. 18297PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, C.
In order to properly understand the questions presented by| this appeal, it is necessary to examine in connection herewith the opinion of this court in the case of Riverside Oil & Refining Co. v. Lynch, 114 Okla. 198, 243 Pac. 967, for the reason that this action flows from the result of that decision. It will be observed from that opinion that the case was originally brought by S. D. Lynch and certain other minority stockholders of the Riverside Oil & Refining Company!, a corporation, for the benefit of the corporation, against the Riverside Oil & Refining Company in its corporate…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Continental Securities Co. v. . BelmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- von Arnim v. American Tube WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Godley v. . Crandall Godley Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- McConnell v. Combination Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- James v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Horath v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- In re the Estate of SidmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- State ex rel. Department of Human Services ex rel. Bowens v. PoorCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.