Legal Opinion

Argue v. Wilson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1935No. Civ. 9120PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J., pro tem.

In an action instituted by plaintiff, a cross-complaint was filed against him on which judgment was recovered in the trial court. His insurance carrier gave cross-complainants a draft for the amount of the judgment, payable upon presentation to the insurance company’s office in New Orleans, Louisiana, but two days later and while the draft in due business course was in transit for presentation and before it was presented for payment a receiver took over the company’s assets and payment was refused and the draft dishonored. A satisfaction of the judgment which had been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zuver v. General Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Clark v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Schreiber v. HookerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Carrigg v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Wherry v. RamboCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Escobar v. Fresh Express CA6California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API