Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 16, 1982No. 8127SC872PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

In his first assignment of error, defendant argues that “the court committed error in permitting the State to enter certain articles into evidence without first requiring the State to lay the proper foundation for their admission.” Defendant’s contention is that the requisite foundation must include testimony that the articles admitted, here a .45 caliber automatic pistol, a green army jacket, and $89 in currency, were identical with or similar to the articles used or taken by the actual culprit when he committed the crime.

“Real evidence is that evidence which is provided by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. MandinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. PlattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API