State v. Platt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Appeal of Defendant Alphonso Platt, Jr.
Defendant Alphonso Platt contends the court erred in admitting the prior statement of Willie Townsend. For the reasons below, we hold that the court erred by admitting this statement but that this error was not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial in light of other similar evidence properly admitted at trial.
The State initially called Willie Townsend to testify as a witness at trial. After stating his name and address, the prosecution handed Townsend a prior statement which he had given to the police on 1 December 1985 regarding…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. SillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. McKeithanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SellersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. Taurice Marquese CrispCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. EmeryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. PoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.