Legal Opinion

State v. Prince

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 8010SC276PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendant’s first assignment of error pertains to the charge. The court correctly charged the jury as to what the State had to prove in order for the jury to find the defendant guilty of forgery. Then in the final mandate it charged as follows:

“So I charge if you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or about the 25th day of April, 1979, the defendant, Bobby Wayne Prince, intending to defraud and intending to suggest that the checks identified by State’s Exhibit 1 and 2 were genuine, it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty as charged.”

Two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. JollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. WalstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Dixon v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API