Legal Opinion

State v. Bell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 19, 1980No. 8012SC65PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court committed reversible error by permitting the jury during deliberation to take three witnesses’ statements into the jury room in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1233, which statute provides in relevant part:

“(b) Upon request by the jury and with consent of all parties, the judge may in his discretion permit the jury to take to the jury room exhibits and writings which have been received in evidence. If the judge permits the jury to take to the jury room requested exhibits and writings, he may have the jury take additional material or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. . StephensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Nicholson v. Eureka Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Outlaw v. . Hurdle and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  4. Brown v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Watson v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. HinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API