Legal Opinion

State v. Huffstetler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1984No. 329A83PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The defendant was convicted of the first degree murder of Edna Cordell Powell and sentenced to death. He brings forward assignments of error relative to the guilt-innocence phase of his trial and the sentencing phase. Having considered with care the entire record and each of the assignments, we find no prejudicial error in either phase of the defendant’s trial. We do not disturb the defendant’s conviction or the sentence of death.

The evidence as presented by the State tended to show that in December 1982 the defendant, David Earl Huffstetler, and his wife, Ruby Huffstetler,…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. McDonald v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API