Legal Opinion

Foust v. San Jose Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 2011No. H036190PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

Richard Foust appeals from a judgment entered in favor of San Jose Construction Company, Inc. (San Jose Construction), following a three-day court trial on his claim that San Jose Construction breached a written employment contract. Foust argues that the trial court erred in finding that his written employment contract was subsequently modified. In preparing the record on appeal, Foust elected to proceed without a reporter’s transcript and designated only a partial clerk’s transcript.

San Jose Construction, in addition to arguing the merits of the case, has brought a separate…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Howard v. Owens CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Kim v. Westmoore Partners, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Habash v. L.A Pacific Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Bel Air Internet, LLC v. Morales, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Fernandes v. Singh, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API