Legal Opinion

Ballard v. Uribe

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1986No. L.A. 31799PublishedCited by 291 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

In this personal injury case, which was bifurcated to permit separate determinations of liability and damages, the jury found defendant liable and rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $200,000. Defendant seeks to overturn the finding of liability on the basis of instructional error. Plaintiff, by cross-appeal, seeks to overturn the damages verdict on the basis of instructional error and juror misconduct. We find no error requiring reversal, and therefore affirm.

I

Plaintiff was injured in December 1975 while using an “aerial manlift” owned by defendant. At the time of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Richardson v. HamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by291 opinions

  1. Ileto v. Glock Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

286 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API