Legal Opinion
Fernandes v. Singh
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided October 5, 2017No. C080264PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuarte, J.
*934Tammy Fernandes successfully sued vexatious litigant Raj Singh and his wife Kiran Rawat individually and as trustees of the Sita Ram-or "Sitaram"-Trust (Trust), for wrongful eviction and related claims. She obtained an award of compensatory and punitive damages, as well as costs and attorney fees. All defendants filed a joint notice of appeal through counsel. While Rawat and the Trust remain represented by counsel on appeal, Singh now represents himself.1
On appeal, Rawat claims error in the trial court's denial of her motion to vacate the judgment based on lack of service, and attacks the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Roby v. McKesson Corp.California Supreme Court · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bunzl Distribution USA, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Vaughn v. Vaughn (In re Vaughn), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Alameda County Dept. of Child etc. v. Jacob C. CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- American Contractors Indemnity Co. v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Bunzl Distribution USA, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.